3.26.2008

US Deploys Nuclear Sub to Persian Gulf; New Reason to Protest IRS :)

US Nuclear submarine, like one pictured above,
just took off to visit Persian Gulf
and the general Iran neighborhood

Not to pick on you Nick, but I disagree on not protesting the IRS....so much so I have to write a big post instead of just a comment on yours :) It is true that every dime Bush has asked Congress for the war has been on an emergency supplemental....not in our budget. Our adventures in Iraq as well as Afghanistan have been funded entirely on debt. For the first time in American history, taxes go DOWN in wartime.

Well, sort of. As we know, 43% of our tax dollars went to military spending last year. You can't just subtract out the largest defense system on the planet and not include it in fighting two wars that are breaking down the military. After all, we spend half of what the entire world collectively spends on defense.... you can't just pretend like that is totally separate from bombing Iraq an average of 4 times a day.

Everything from the ammunition and tanks to the cluster bomb stockpiles to the fighter jets....we use what we had in storage for raining fire on Iraq and Afghanistan, and then Bush asks for "emergency supplementals" to "refresh" our supplies. Then that exhaustion of the military gets factored in for the next years...and lo and behold, the Pentagon then asks us to increase military spending!

We can't just subtract the fact that the war planners are being paid on our tax dollars.... this is all of course just the beginning. Look, the money for the so-called "War on Terror" is fungible. They have done it before...taken money from the Pentagon before getting the funds from Congress. Just like we started bombing Iraq intensively months before authorization from Congress for a full scale get out Saddam mission. (That is right, over 54 tons dropped on southern Iraq in September 2002...a month before Congress authorized it. Of course we had been bombing Iraq off and on since 1990, but we escalated air power on Iraq right up before the invasion to provoke a retaliation from Saddam.)

Besides, plenty of other things to protest at the IRS about...we just deployed a nuclear submarine to the Persian Gulf, amidst rumors that Cheney is telling our friendly Arab dictators that next target is Iran.

And what would happen from a cold fiscal view if we went to war with Iran? Long after bombing Iran Bush and Cheney would politely request money from Congress for an "emergency" supplemental. Let's remember that a large majority of Congress voted against the idea that congressional authorization for attacking Iran was necessary.

So, to the extent that protest is how you can be most effective, protest at the IRS, protest at the Federal Reserve....there are many different players in promoting the de-stabilization of the Middle East. And we will certainly be paying off this war on debt, but we are also paying it with our own entire tax-payer funded defense system and defense capabilities...not to mention the whole ethical part of bombing a people (or multiple peoples) and stripping their sovereignty and what that does to our security situation...or soul.

4 Comments:

Blogger Caroline said...

Ok -- I agree with what you're saying, but still -- the people who work at the IRS don't make tax policy -- Congress does (and the President). Wouldn't it make more sense to rustle them up?

I don't understand though that to getting people thinking about funding as the real root of war, the image of barricading the IRS is more powerful (not everyone understands the appropriations process quite so well as we :))

So.. random musings, but I can see it both ways right now.

4:27 PM  
Blogger Caroline said...

amendment-- I DO understand though...

4:28 PM  
Blogger Claire said...

I take issue with you saying linking Iraq to the pathetic shape of human needs in this country is problematic...It is not so crazy to think that if we spent a little less in Iraq and the military we might be able to put a little more into our public schools, our health care system, and our job training. We're not talking about spending $3 trillion on welfare payments, we are talking about modest investments in the future of this country.

10:21 AM  
Blogger Trevor said...

I think "linking Iraq to the pathetic shape of human needs in this country" highlights the potential--what could be done--to help undermine poverty, provide jobs, and invest in public infrastructure in the US.

Linking Iraq to domestic human needs helps illustrate the extreme amount of $$$ that is being funneled into the war, and shows how even a small percentage of these funds could be used to do so much at home and aboad, rather than contribute to the destruction of Iraq.

12:58 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home